* Stefan Monnier [2016-07-22 11:24]:
> > * LeMaker HiKey (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B019O3QTSA), $169 USD
> > * SnapDragon 410c (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B01600X7IU), $75 USD
>
> Do any of these work with vanilla U-Boot and kernel?
The DragonBoard 410c has mainline u-boot support. When I enabled
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The page is obsolete, since a month ago that code is already in unstable.
> It's qemu-user only, though, so you can use it to build and run stuff but
> not to debug bootloaders, the kernel or such.
Full aarch64 system emulation is in qemu u
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:24:38PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > is there a clear set of instructions
> > somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
> > qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Arm64
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Wookey wrote:
> The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
> passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
> pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
awesome
> Thus I'd love it if anyone else could help go through the fai
> suggestion, wookey: i'd love to help... but obviously with no
> hardware that's kinda hard: is there a clear set of instructions
> somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
> qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
https://wiki.debian.org/
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wo
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > > Also if anyone has expertise in language portin
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > > from you. Below is the list of languages we
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> > arm64:
>
> Ruby wasn't on the l
Am 15.05.2014 03:10, schrieb Wookey:
> Go (we have gccgo, but not gcgo)
this is not arm64 specific. Debian has a serious problem in that the current Go
maintainers are focused on gc only, which only supports amd64, i386, armhf, and
probably armel.
> Mono
needs porting
> GCL
> CLISP
need porti
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:10:39AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> GHCi (ghc is done, but not ghci - is this hard?)
This is hard. You need either an LLVM-based port or a native code
generator, and in either case I think you need some linker support in
GHC. Both of these are serious compiler engineer proj
Le jeudi 15 mai 2014 à 02:10 +0100, Wookey a écrit :
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
> Julia
Note that currently Julia is only available on i386/amd64 (so no
armel/armhf for
2014-05-15 02:10 Wookey:
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
In the course of that 344 have failed to build, (see
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architect
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under control?
Ruby seems to be at the bottom of the build-d
Am 20.04.2014 03:27, schrieb Wookey:
> There are about 270 pending arm64 bugfixes, some of which will be for those
> build failures:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=arm64
note that more recent bug reports for autoconf related arm64 build failu
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 13:40 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:29:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 09:08 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben H
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:29:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 09:08 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Given that, it seems like a good time t
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 09:08 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Given that, it seems like a good time to add arm64 to src:linux with a
> > > configuration that will run on a
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Given that, it seems like a good time to add arm64 to src:linux with a
> > configuration that will run on at least a typical QEMU ARM64 emulation.
>
> AIUI qemu 2.0 only does
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming.
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> That said I can't see any reason not to get started on an arm64 kernel.
Except:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-linux-dummy : Depends: python but it is not going to be
installed
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 17:08 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> > arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> > CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
> > available 64-bit silico
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> > > arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' an
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> > arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> > CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from i
> You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
> available 64-bit silicon yet, but that'll be changing rapidly later
> this year and this
On 20 April 2014 15:30, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>> You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
>> arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
>> CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
> available 64-bit silicon yet
qe
Hi Wookey,
Wookey (2014-04-20):
> You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
> available 64-bit silicon yet, but that'll be changing
+++ Wookey [2013-02-27 02:10 +]:
> State of the Debian/Ubuntu arm64 port
> =
>
> *** Arm64 lives! ***
>
> Executive summary
> -
>
> * There is now a bootable (raring) image to download and run
> * A bit more work is needed to make the ro
Nice work, Wookey! If experience cross-building for armhf is any guide,
all you need for NSS is a host build of shlibsign; see
https://github.com/mkedwards/crosstool-ng/blob/master/patches/nss/3.12.10/0001-Modify-shlibsign-wrapper-for-cross-compilation.patch.
There's also scriptage in that repo f
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 06:38:55PM -0300, Cláudio Sampaio wrote:
> Is there any device with Aarch64 on sale? I couldn't find any, only some
> mentions from Calxeda.
> Would you mind to provide suggestions of any seller which sells through the
> internet?
There are none for sale yet. I believe som
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
> State of the Debian/Ubuntu arm64 port
> =
>
> *** Arm64 lives! ***
>
Hi,
Is there any device with Aarch64 on sale? I couldn't find any, only some
mentions from Calxeda.
Would you mind to provide suggestions of
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 13:37 +, Wookey wrote:
> I had to choose between getting this working in vaguely finite time
> and keeping both Debian and Ubuntu bootstraps in sync, so unstable
> just got stuck at the 'toolchain bootstrap needed' stage.
That's quite reasonable
> Is raring useful to you
+++ Ian Campbell [2013-02-27 12:00 +]:
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 02:10 +, Wookey wrote:
> >
> > Setting up an arm64 build environment is very simple. Use
> > sbuild-createchroot or mk-sbuild
> > and point at the bootstrap repo, with a bit of config and some updated
> > tools packages from
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 02:10 +, Wookey wrote:
>
> Setting up an arm64 build environment is very simple. Use sbuild-createchroot
> or mk-sbuild
> and point at the bootstrap repo, with a bit of config and some updated tools
> packages from
> the repo (amd64 only supplied). Details are given on
W dniu 27.02.2013 03:10, Wookey pisze:
> State of the Debian/Ubuntu arm64 port
> =
>
> *** Arm64 lives! ***
Congratulations Wookey (and everyone involved)!
> * There is now a bootable (raring) image to download and run
> Once you've created a tarball chroot
37 matches
Mail list logo
