Re: apt-0.0.16 and libc6-2.0.7r2

1998-06-25 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 09:16:25AM -0500, Douglas Bates wrote: > I haven't been following the discussion on the libc6 naming (too > little time, I'm afraid) so I may have missed any fixes to this. I > have apt 0.0.16-1 and libc6 2.0.7r-2 installed. I installed apt > before the upgrade of libc6. >

Re: APT 0.0.16

1998-06-11 Thread Steve Dunham
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) writes: > > > APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there > > are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days. > It is running pretty fine, but there is one thing

Re: APT 0.0.16

1998-06-11 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there > are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days. Just grabbed it after doing a dselect update and select with apt 15. Went back to dselect for an up