Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1996-01-01 Thread Ian Murdock
A few weeks ago, I said... Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 10:38:18 -0500 (EST) From: Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the development release back into

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Murdock writes ("Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions"): > I'll give people another day or so to comment on this. If there are no > serious objections during this time, I'm going to move the release back > into /debian. I agree - modulo telling people about it. Could y

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-18 Thread Harald Schueler
On Sun, 17 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote: > From: Bill Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Am I that confused. I thoght that the release presently reachable > > through ftp.debian.org:/debian/development was the development > > release. > > Yes. He means making it reachable to mirror programs that a

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-18 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Bill Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Am I that confused. I thoght that the release presently reachable > through ftp.debian.org:/debian/development was the development > release. Yes. He means making it reachable to mirror programs that aren't explicitly looking for it. Bruce -- Bru

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-17 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Mon, 18 Dec 1995, Karl Ferguson wrote: > > ... relocating the development release ...] > > Ian, if you do decide to do number 2, could you please give us a little > notice by posting to devel beforehand? I just dont want to have to > delete and re-mirror the 1.0 stuff (as well as the other m

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-17 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 17 Dec 1995, Ian Murdock wrote: > Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development > release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the > development release back into a readable directory, making it clear that > it's still under development. A

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-17 Thread Karl Ferguson
> Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development > release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the > development release back into a readable directory, making it clear that > it's still under development. > > Personally, I prefer (2). I don't want

Re: ALPHA-TEST permissions

1995-12-17 Thread Ian Murdock
On Wed, 13 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote: > I'll let Ian Murdock decide what he wants to do about this. Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the development release back into a readable directory