Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-13 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:43:16 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you claim to have rewritten my awk script in perl, > you should have done something which checks the > deps AND the builddeps. Now count-depends-field looks for both dependency and build-dependency by default. top

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > scp auric.debian.org:~tausq/bdepvis ./ > > However, perhaps tausq should put this file in his public_html... not? Heh, maybe, maybe not. There could be an assortment of build-related tools package. This is what I'm aiming at creating at s

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:24:54 +0900, > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, please change the name of your package, because it is confusing, > Rename to what? "count-depends-field"? Any suggestion? That sounds more decent. >

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:13:50 -0700, > Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > auric:~tausq/bdepvis if anyone is interested. > I can't find it. http://auric.debian.org/~tausq/ shows no > file named "bdepvis". That's not what's meant. it's written

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:24:54 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, please change the name of your package, because it is confusing, Rename to what? "count-depends-field"? Any suggestion? > and does something different. Something like this? # package tkdvi # * level 0 # ** sear

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:13:50 -0700, Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > auric:~tausq/bdepvis if anyone is interested. I can't find it. http://auric.debian.org/~tausq/ shows no file named "bdepvis". -- Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University PGP Key h

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > Depends list > http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/analyse-packages/result-packages.txt.bz2 And this is the same kind of thing as http://auric.debian.org/~tausq/buildd/ia64-latest.html > Build-Depends list > http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oo

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > values. These things should have had trouble when porting to new arches, > > but anyway, I have put the script up on > > http://mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp/~dancer/analyse-sourcepackages > I rewrote it from scratch in Perl. No, you have written a

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:01:38 +0200 (CEST), Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:11:28 +0900, > > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was writing a script to see how much a package is depended upon, > > > i.

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:06:04AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > libc6-dev (Source: glibc) has Build-Depends: gcc-3.0-sparc64 [sparc] . > gcc-3.0-sparc64 (Source: gcc-3.0) has Build-Depends-Indep: doxygen . You are correct. I had overlooked Build-Depends-Indep in my manual scan. -- - mdz

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:42:36 -0400, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:43:36AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > > > [snip binary package dependencies] > > > > The number of the *binary* packages that Build-Depends on a package: > > ./analyse-sources.perl | sort -n -

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Randolph Chung
> As I anticipated, it has a lot of "loops", and it is going in ridiculous > values. These things should have had trouble when porting to new arches, > but anyway, I have put the script up on > http://mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp/~dancer/analyse-sourcepackages neato i had written something somewhat

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:43:36AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > [snip binary package dependencies] > > The number of the *binary* packages that Build-Depends on a package: > ./analyse-sources.perl | sort -n -r > 5208 libncurses-dev > 5203 libgc5-dev > 5203 doxygen I suspect a bug here. I can onl

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:11:28 +0900, > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was writing a script to see how much a package is depended upon, > > i. e. cumulatively culculating Reverse-Build-Deps, and > > Reverse-dependencies. However, I thought i

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-11 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:11:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was writing a script to see how much a package is depended upon, > i. e. cumulatively culculating Reverse-Build-Deps, and > Reverse-dependencies. However, I thought it might be useful to see > what kind of packages hav

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > 29400691 docbook > > Uh ? There was a flaw of logic, as it were. It should be something around 3000-1. I presume. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ grep-available -F Depends -s Package docbook > Package: cygnus-stylesheets > Package: d

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-07 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:11:28AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Hello, > > > I was writing a script to see how much a package is depended upon, > i. e. cumulatively culculating Reverse-Build-Deps, and > Reverse-dependencies. However, I thought it might be useful to see > what kind of package

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > As I anticipated, it has a lot of "loops", and it is going in ridiculous > > values. These things should have had trouble when porting to new arches, > > Hell, they did! It took ages to become somewhat self-contained Debian wise. > One

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-06 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:11:28AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > As I anticipated, it has a lot of "loops", and it is going in ridiculous > values. These things should have had trouble when porting to new arches, Hell, they did! It took ages to become somewhat self-contained Debian wise. One pro

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-06 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > > > 3.24463e+09 liburi-perl > > > > You need to debug your script. We don't have this much packages in any of > > our archives. Not even... > > > > [...] > > > 29169746 readline4 > > > > ...

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > 3.24463e+09 liburi-perl > > You need to debug your script. We don't have this much packages in any of > our archives. Not even... > > [...] > > 29169746 readline4 > > ... this much. > I think this signifies that packages depend on its

Re: A script to see how much a package is depended upon.

2001-09-06 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Hello, > > > I was writing a script to see how much a package is depended upon, > i. e. cumulatively culculating Reverse-Build-Deps, and > Reverse-dependencies. However, I thought it might be useful to see > what kind of packages have a "weight", i.