On Sun, 1 Sep 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> 'Distribution: experimental' means unstable, doesn't it? Or do you really mean
> the experimental subtree under project?
No, `experimental' means the experimental subtree under project.
`unstable' is unstable.
Guy
Ian Jackson writes:
> When a package is uploaded an announcement should be posted to
> package name and version number, and a very short summary of the
> changes, in the PGP-signed be added before the start of the
Okay IMO.
> If a package is released with announcement should be posted to
Michael Meskes writes ("Re: 96 New Debian i386 Packages"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > Can we please have a statement on what we should do ?
> >
> > I think we should post the release announcements to debian-changes as
> > well has having the summary posti
Ian Jackson writes:
> Can we please have a statement on what we should do ?
>
> I think we should post the release announcements to debian-changes as
> well has having the summary postings.
>
> If people want just the summaries we should provide a separate list.
I second all of that.
Michael
-
Michael Meskes writes ("Re: 96 New Debian i386 Packages"):
...
> I've scanned through this list and found quite a lot of packages I never
> read an announcement of. I usually read debian-{devel,changes,user,private}
> so I take it I should have found this announcements.
Guy Maor writes:
> The 'xx New Debian i386 Packages' mail *is* the announcement I
Oops, then I missed something. Aren't we supposed to make an announcement
anymore?
> mentioned earlier. Some developers also post the .changes file when
> they upload it, but that's at their option. It really isn'
On Thu, 22 Aug 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I've scanned through this list and found quite a lot of packages I never
> read an announcement of. I usually read debian-{devel,changes,user,private}
> so I take it I should have found this announcements. But I never have. Did I
> just miss them? Or is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> These i386 packages were installed into the Debian hierarchy.
> Unfortunately, the version number changes and locations are incorrect
> in a few cases. The bug has since been fixed.
>
> [...]
I've scanned through this list and found quite a lot of packages I never
8 matches
Mail list logo
