On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 10:01:30AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
> >> At one level, krb5-multidev only has an rdep of 5, but I suspect
> >> the rdep count for libkrb5-dev is somewhat larger:-) I don't know
> >> how many packages would be removed f
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
>> At one level, krb5-multidev only has an rdep of 5, but I suspect
>> the rdep count for libkrb5-dev is somewhat larger:-) I don't know
>> how many packages would be removed from the transition if we
>> decide most of the krb5 libraries do
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:23:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I am also attaching here the dd-list output for the packages that will need
> to be sourcefully NMUed for the transition, for your review.
I could readily identify a number of packages (incomplete) also affected
by DEP17. Whenever y
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 02:23:59PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
> Steve> - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map
> Steve> from a set of headers in a dev package to specific shared
> Steve> libraries in a runtime library packa
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:28:37PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Guillem Jover
> >libaio
> >libmd
> >liburing
> I checked these, and it looks like libmd and liburing are
> false-positives?
> * libmd uses AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, and on 32-bit arches it is already built
>with LFS, the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:59:20PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > I am also attaching here the dd-list output for the packages that will
> > > > need
> > > > to be sourcefully NMUed for the transition, for your review.
> > > Why do the need sourceful NMUs if they just need to be rebuilt
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
Steve> - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map
Steve> from a set of headers in a dev package to specific shared
Steve> libraries in a runtime library package that's not
Steve> additionally computationally prohibitive; we
Hi Steve
On 2024-01-05 09:42:06 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:34:38PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-01-05 00:23:00 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:17:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > == Results ==
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:34:38PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-01-05 00:23:00 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:17:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > == Results ==
> > > The overall findings of this analysis are 1,745 "dev" packages whic
On 2024-01-05 00:23:00 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:17:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > == Results ==
> >
> > The overall findings of this analysis are 1,745 "dev" packages which either
> > are confirmed to have ABI changes or could not be checked; mapping to 2,15
Hi!
[ It seems the original post didn't get through to debian-devel (yet?),
I found it on debian-release though
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00033.html,
you might want to repost it here though, so that it can be commented
on properly? :) ]
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 00:23
11 matches
Mail list logo
