Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-11 Thread Niels Thykier
Simon McVittie: On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 03:18:16 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-02-09 17:32:08) - No intervention from individual maintainers is required for fixing this, as we already have a binNMU mechanism which we already use for transitions. Onc

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes: Johannes> This will of course just paper over the issue without Johannes> fixing the underlying cause. It's what I called "not a Johannes> good idea" in my last mail. I like the explicit chgrp style because it explicitly do

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 10/2/23 a las 3:18, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: So the chgrp call in Makefile.am worked correctly and set the group owner to "mail" but after dh_install moved mutt_dotlock from debian/tmp/ to debian/mutt/ using 'cp -a' (if I'm reading the code correctly) the group ownership info

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-10 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-02-10 11:12:09) > El 10/2/23 a las 3:18, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: > > I do not understand what makes you think that only packages using > > dh_fixperms > > -X are affected? I think what makes the two packages that I found fail to > > have > > correct

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 10/2/23 a las 3:18, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: I do not understand what makes you think that only packages using dh_fixperms -X are affected? I think what makes the two packages that I found fail to have correct permissions is that they both use dh_install which in turn uses 'c

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-10 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 03:18:16 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-02-09 17:32:08) > > - No intervention from individual maintainers is required for fixing this, > > as > > we already have a binNMU mechanism which we already use for transitions. > > Once

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-09 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-02-09 17:32:08) > El 9/2/23 a las 15:37, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: > > I wanted to bring fakeroot bugs #1023286 and #1030638 to the attention of a > > wider audience because even though I filed these bugs, > > Thanks for bringing this up! > > Can

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-09 Thread Santiago Vila
El 9/2/23 a las 15:37, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: I wanted to bring fakeroot bugs #1023286 and #1030638 to the attention of a wider audience because even though I filed these bugs, Thanks for bringing this up! Can you confirm if all this is correct? - Only packages uploaded af