Re: 2.5 IPsec kernel patch: orphaning the grsecurity patch

2003-10-17 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:12:55PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > > also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]: > > > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between > > > IPsec

Re: 2.5 IPsec kernel patch: orphaning the grsecurity patch

2003-10-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]: > > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between > > IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to > > De

Re: 2.5 IPsec kernel patch: orphaning the grsecurity patch

2003-10-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]: > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between > IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to > Debian kernel source, I'd take IPsec anyday. Well, I would do it the other

Re: 2.5 IPsec kernel patch: orphaning the grsecurity patch

2003-10-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with "actively > waiting for problems to go away". > > I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest. > Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants beca

Re: 2.5 IPsec kernel patch: orphaning the grsecurity patch

2003-10-13 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, martin f krafft wrote: > Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because > apparently noone gives a flying food. Disagree. Some people, myself among them, have stated their unhappiness. To me personally, though, it doesn't matter that much. I'd rather spend the time on gettng