Re: 2.5/2.6 IPsec stack should live in a kernel-patch!

2003-10-17 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:31:47PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:38:45 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Domenico Andreoli) wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.] > > > > > > On W

Re: 2.5/2.6 IPsec stack should live in a kernel-patch!

2003-10-01 Thread Jim Penny
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:38:45 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Domenico Andreoli) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.] > > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:56:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > > > > T

Re: 2.5/2.6 IPsec stack should live in a kernel-patch!

2003-10-01 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.] > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:56:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > > Thus I propose that Herbert should remove the IPsec patch and make > > it a separate kernel-p