>From the buildlogs / testlogs / local tests (ppc64el qemu), it seems that
there is completely no improvement for ppc64el. Simple scripts can still
encounter segmentation faults (e.g., autopkgtest for src:lua-moses).
s390x is newly enabled. I still have not seen enough test log to give
any prelimin
Hi Frédéric,
On 09-06-2022 16:19, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
did you see any improvement with luajit2 ?
Improvements, yes. All fixed, no.
I was looking at luakit, which still fails "silently" on ppc64el, a lua
script generating a .h with no symbols with luajit2, where it does work
with lua.
Als
Hi Mo, Paul,
did you see any improvement with luajit2 ?
I was looking at luakit, which still fails "silently" on ppc64el, a lua
script generating a .h with no symbols with luajit2, where it does work
with lua.
Also I see that the autopkgtest of knot-resolver still fails on
ppc64el.
F.
On Thu, 19
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 16:30 +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've followed luajit closely since 2015 on ppc64el as a porter
> without enough knowledge to port it, but trying to ease on the
> packaging/Debian side (being both IBMer/DD).
> That port has been a mixed effort between a code bou
Hi Dipack,
I filed an ITP bug for luajit2 and will look into it.
Thank you!
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 16:22 +, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
> Hello all,
> It'd be better to switch to luajit2 if it is possible. We can see
> right now the main issue with luajit project is no response from
> upstream of LuaJI
Hi,
I've followed luajit closely since 2015 on ppc64el as a porter
without enough knowledge to port it, but trying to ease on the
packaging/Debian side (being both IBMer/DD).
That port has been a mixed effort between a code bounty and an IBM
effort (some devs) .
It didn't started well (
https://w
Hello all,
It'd be better to switch to luajit2 if it is possible. We can see right now the
main issue with luajit project is no response from upstream of LuaJIT to
previous merge request attempts. And luajit2 already contains almost everything
needed for s390x support.
Thanks,
-Dipak
From: M.
Hi!
On 5/12/22 03:29, M. Zhou wrote:
> I learned in disappointment after becoming LuaJit uploader that
> the LuaJit upstream behaves uncooperatively especially for IBM
> architectures [1]. IIUC, the upstream has no intention to care
> about IBM architectures (ppc64el, s390x).
>
> The current ppc6
8 matches
Mail list logo
