Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-05 Thread Michael Meskes
Bruce Perens writes: > > It's OK with me if the guidelines specify that shared libraries be > stripped. Ian, would you please add this then? Michael -- Michael Meskes |_ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-04 Thread Bruce Perens
It's OK with me if the guidelines specify that shared libraries be stripped. Thanks Bruce

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-04 Thread Michael Meskes
Bruce Perens writes: > Yes. There is a different symbol table for shared objects that you can > print with "nm --dynamic". So could we please add this in the guidelines? I didn't check the guidelines on this but we should also ask the libraries (static and dynamic) to not contain debugging symbols

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-04 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can we strip shared libraries? Yes. There is a different symbol table for shared objects that you can print with "nm --dynamic". Bruce

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi Dominik, > > /lib/libc.so.5.4.4: no symbols > > This is most certainly a bug! Why? It works without a problem. I got this libc by using David's Debian files with HJ's sources. > Try debug a dynamically linked binary using gdb and you will see lots of > messages about loading symbols from the

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-02 Thread Dominik Kubla
Hi Michael, [...] > /lib/libc.so.5.4.4: no symbols This is most certainly a bug! [...] > since it saves an awful lot of disk space. If for some reasons the symbols > are needed could anyone tell me why my libc works? Try debug a dynamically linked binary using gdb and you will see lots of messa