Le jeudi, 30 août 2012 14.46:33, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > We are building a binary distribution which main characteristic is to
> > have the packages built _rarely_. As such, a useful but CPU-expensive
> > operation is always
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> We are building a binary distribution which main characteristic is to have
> the
> packages built _rarely_. As such, a useful but CPU-expensive operation is
> always worth it.
The situation is slightly different for Debian-
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:11:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> People have worried about it, but I think the consensus from DebConf
>> is that we don't want to be hampered in our own development by
>> considering external users
>
>How are "external users" different from "users
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> People have worried about it, but I think the consensus from DebConf
> is that we don't want to be hampered in our own development by
> considering external users
How are "external users" different from "users"?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Marco wrote:
>On Aug 29, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
>> I thought this was already the consensus, and the only dissenting
>> opinion was that the base system should still be using gzip so that
>> foreign non-Debian systems can unpack it w/o requiring to build or
>> install xz beforehand.
>I am not sure
Le mercredi, 29 août 2012 16.01:43, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:56:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Before wondering whether PNG files should have an additional
> > compression level, is there any reason why a better PNG compression
> > isn't used in the first place? Fo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:17:15PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I don't think it's worth +dfsg, and CPU cycles will only be wasted once
> on the maintainer side, since most of PNGs are in arch:all packages anyway.
I used to hack on the games-thumbnails package a bit, which ran optipng as part
On 29/08/12 15:01, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:56:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> Before wondering whether PNG files should have an additional
>> compression level, is there any reason why a better PNG compression
>> isn't used in the first place? For instance, "optipng -o
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:56:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Before wondering whether PNG files should have an additional
> compression level, is there any reason why a better PNG compression
> isn't used in the first place? For instance, "optipng -o9" tries
> various parameters and keeps the
On Aug 29, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I thought this was already the consensus, and the only dissenting
> opinion was that the base system should still be using gzip so that
> foreign non-Debian systems can unpack it w/o requiring to build or
> install xz beforehand.
I am not sure if there was a cons
Hi!
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 12:10:18 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> In DebConf12, I talked about xz compression for Debian packages(*).
> Now I'll talk about next step, suggestion for use xz with with result
> from some experiment.
> ---
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:56:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Before wondering whether PNG files should have an additional
> compression level, is there any reason why a better PNG compression
> isn't used in the first place? For instance, "optipng -o9" tries
> various parameters and keeps the
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:10:18PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> --
> conclusion (rest)
> --
> I recommend to use xz ***by default*** (with approp
On 2012-08-28 12:05:26 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:10:18PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > We know some packages are better to use gzip, but it's an
> > exception. Using xz is best choice for rest 99.99% of packages.
> > We can deal with such exception by specifying
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:10:18PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> We know some packages are better to use gzip, but it's an exception. Using xz
> is best choice for rest 99.99% of packages. We can deal with such exception
> by specifying gzip for that (e.g. openclipart-png).
Or even no compressi
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:10:18PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> In DebConf12, I talked about xz compression for Debian packages(*).
> Now I'll talk about next step, suggestion for use xz with with result
> from some experiment.
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
