On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 12:56:58PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> ouch! please do file this as a distinct bug report, it's something i
> haven't run into myself and i'd like to track it down.
Done, that's #833596.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . .
On Sat 2016-08-06 06:32:39 -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> >> systemctl --user enable gpg-agent
>> >> systemctl --user enable dirmngr
>
> OTOH, doing this inhibited a proper start of my GNOME session at next
> login: only Nautilus started (I can tell because I've it handle my
> desktop icon
On Sat 2016-08-06 02:24:24 -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> There are good reasons to want to have the agent running over time and
>> not terminating with the individual invocations of gpg1. In particular,
>> passphrase caching and smartcar
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:24, p...@debian.org said:
> BTW, does this make parcimonie obsolete? I noticed that dirmngr
We plan to add similar fucntionality to dirmngr but that has not yet
been done and I am not sure whether we will have it for 2.2.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind fr
[ quoted text reordered ]
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:43:30PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The simplest way to see the control group hierarchy is with "systemctl
> status". When these processes are launched by the user service, they'll
> end up in the user@.service like this:
[...]
> If
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:02:07PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> My long-term goal is to have these things Just Work without *any*
> explicit user intervention.
>
> That is, i want: "If the package is installed, it should work for you."
> and not: "oh, if you want things to actually work, ju
On Fri 2016-08-05 15:03:29 -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:51:07PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I don't think there's any need to add no-autostart in this case. in
>> particular, the daemon will already be running, so any consideration of
>> autostart will just det
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:51:07PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I don't think there's any need to add no-autostart in this case. in
> particular, the daemon will already be running, so any consideration of
> autostart will just detect and make use of the already-running daemon.
This is pre
On Fri 2016-08-05 14:17:23 -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:41:18PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On desktop systems (where i'd expect the majority of secret key access
>> happens), for folks who are running systemd, i recommend enabling the
>> systemd user servi
On Fri 2016-08-05 13:39:10 -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:41:18PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On desktop systems (where i'd expect the majority of secret key access
>> happens), for folks who are running systemd, i recommend enabling the
>> systemd user services,
10 matches
Mail list logo
