On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> The problem here is that we can't distribute it under the terms of the GPL
> (read the kde announcement) while they say it is plain GPL, so they say
> they can include other people's GPL-ed stuff. glibc2 doesnt have a
> contradicto
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> > > > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> > > > with XForms.
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > I don't think s
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> > How can we be sure that LyX does not include things not written by them?
>
> Wait a moment. Don't let this become ridiculous. How can we be sure that
> Ulrich Depper didn't include n
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> How can we be sure that LyX does not include things not written by them?
Wait a moment. Don't let this become ridiculous. How can we be sure that
Ulrich Depper didn't include non-GPL stuff in his glibc? You can ask this
ofr every
>> > > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
>> > > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
>> > > with XForms.
>> > > [...]
>> >
>> > I don't think so. It is not enough for KDE, why should it be enough for
>> > LyX ?
>>
>> It's not en
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:07:31PM +, Raja R Harinath wrote:
> > > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> > > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> > > with XForms.
> >
> > I don't see how it follows. "
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 11:18:53PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> Because *implicit* permission isn't good enough. By default *nothing* is
> allowed. So every right the authors grant you had better be written down
> in a license accompanying the software, otherwise one of the authors (or
> sometimes
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:07:31PM +, Raja R Harinath wrote:
> > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> > with XForms.
>
> I don't see how it follows. "we have implicitly allowed all use
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 10:52:19PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> > > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> > > with XForms.
> > >
The main difference is that LyX is THEIR code. The problem w/ KDE is not so
much its own code, rather it links other peoples GPL app w/QT and KDE to make
Kapp. This is the brunt of the legal issue. The authors of app where not asked
if it was ok to link w/QT, nor was the license modified to refl
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 10:52:19PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> > [...]
> > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> > with XForms.
> > [...]
>
> I don't think so. It is not enough for KDE,
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:07:31PM +, Raja R Harinath wrote:
> I don't see how it follows. "we have implicitly allowed all users to
> link LyX with XForms" does not imply "we have implicitly allowed
> (re)distribution of the resulting LyX binaries", which I guess is the
> issue at hand.
Becau
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would this be enough for LyX? I think so.
>
> - Forwarded message from Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> To: lyx@via.ecp.fr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: copyright problem
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> D
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Would this be enough for LyX? I think so.
>
>
> [...]
> I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
> compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
> with XForms.
> [...]
I don't think so. It is not en
14 matches
Mail list logo
