Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-08-01 23:11:58)
> On 01/08/16 17:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Yes, most of those activities are not in Debian - just as most of
>> shell scripts depending on Zsh is not in Debian, but it would still
>> be a bad idea to kick that package judging from its reve
On 01/08/16 17:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Yes, most of those activities are not in Debian - just as most of shell
> scripts depending on Zsh is not in Debian, but it would still be a bad
> idea to kick that package judging from its reverse dependencies (I
> guess: I am not a Zsh user myself).
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 05:37:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-08-01 16:43:06)
> > On 29/07/16 00:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-07-28 23:29:00)
> >>> It is high time that we remove the old GNOME python bindings. We
>
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-08-01 16:43:06)
> On 29/07/16 00:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-07-28 23:29:00)
>>> It is high time that we remove the old GNOME python bindings. We
>>> have had the "new" GObject introspection support since at least
>>> Sq
4 matches
Mail list logo
