Re: [OT] XML

2012-11-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/27/2012 05:40 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-11-26 20:32:17 +0100, olivier sallou wrote: >> XML is nice for internal config, message/config exchanges, etc... help with >> its structure and its DTD to force/help understanding the schema. >> >> BUT definitely not useable by an end user fo

Re: [OT] XML

2012-11-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-11-26 20:32:17 +0100, olivier sallou wrote: > XML is nice for internal config, message/config exchanges, etc... help with > its structure and its DTD to force/help understanding the schema. > > BUT definitely not useable by an end user for end-user config. It is very > hard to read (openin

Re: [OT] XML

2012-11-26 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Jakub Wilk writes: > * Ivan Shmakov , 2012-11-26, 14:32: >> Seriously, XML takes a lot of concerns off an application >> programmer. It provides quoting, arbitrary hierarchical structure, >> support for different encodings, etc. Why, don't you think that >> $ grep [[:lower:]]' FILE

Re: [OT] XML

2012-11-26 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On 26/11/2012 19:52, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ivan Shmakov , 2012-11-26, 14:32: >> Seriously, XML takes a lot of concerns off an application programmer. It >> provides quoting, arbitrary hierarchical structure, support for different >> encodings, etc. Why, don't you think that $ grep '[[:lower:]]' FIL

Re: [OT] XML

2012-11-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ivan Shmakov , 2012-11-26, 14:32: Seriously, XML takes a lot of concerns off an application programmer. It provides quoting, arbitrary hierarchical structure, support for different encodings, etc. Why, don't you think that $ grep '[[:lower:]]' FILE is ever supposed to work? For surely it isn'