Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 01:09:40AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron) writes: > > I tend to use make-kpkg if I'm building a kernel to use on a different > > machine than the one I'm building it on, but otherwise I usually dont. > > Kernel packages are handy if you wish to intstall

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-22 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron) writes: > I tend to use make-kpkg if I'm building a kernel to use on a different > machine than the one I'm building it on, but otherwise I usually dont. > Kernel packages are handy if you wish to intstall the same kernel image > on multiple machines, but since all my machi

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 04:06:35AM +0930, Ron wrote: > The start of this thread is vague in my memory now, so apologies if I'm > off target here, but I would object to any sort of enforced kernel version > dependancy on a package. > > Just because I have the 'correct' kernel version for a package

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-21 Thread Ron
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:14:49PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > We really should have a policy for things like

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-21 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:14:49PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > [snip] > > > > We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding > > > > another Provides: to ker

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-20 Thread Chris Waters
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > [snip] > > > We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding > > > another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg): > > Because too many peopl

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-20 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: [snip] > > We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding > > another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg): > > Because too many people don't use debian kernel images. How about only mak

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-19 Thread Edward Betts
On Tue, 18 May, 1999, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 02:26:09PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Because too many people don't use debian kernel images. > > > > If people don't use the tools, then they don't get the benefits of the > >

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 02:26:09PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Because too many people don't use debian kernel images. > > If people don't use the tools, then they don't get the benefits of the > tools, which is hardly our fault. This is like saying

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Chris Waters
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding > > another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg): > Because too many people don't use debian kernel images. If people don't use the tools, then they don't

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 07:54:08PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote: > > hftpd is a superb, linux-optimized ftpd. i am going to have a little bit > > in the postinst that makes note that people really should roll their own, > > since it can use a lot of 2.2 kernel features and such. it was written >

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Joel Klecker
At 15:22 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote: How about a 2.2 and 2.0 version? We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg): Package: kernel-image-2.2.7 Version: tr.pre0 Section: base Priority: option

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Ben Collins
> How about a 2.2 and 2.0 version? > > We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding > another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg): > > Package: kernel-image-2.2.7 > Version: tr.pre0 > Section: base > Priority: optional > Architecture: i386 >

Re: [ITP/mostly packaged] hftpd

1999-05-18 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote: > oh, i probably should've mentioned this earlier, but i've been packaging > hftpd. i'm mostly done, but need to hack in an /etc/init.d script, and i > think > i'll be done after that. > > hftpd is a superb, linux-optimized ftpd. i