Re: [Gaim-devel] Re: Gaim-Encryption plugin violates Gaim's license#

2003-06-03 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Monday 02 June 2003 23:31, Sean Egan wrote: > "If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls > to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single > program, so plug-ins must be treated as extensions to the main program. > This means they must be rele

Re: [Gaim-devel] Re: Gaim-Encryption plugin violates Gaim's license#

2003-06-02 Thread Sean Egan
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:28, Robert McQueen wrote: > My concern is that even if you distribute > in source form, you're still condoning ignoring part of Gaim's license, > which seems highly dubious. So as well as saying "Debian will never ship > this" as a Debian developer, I was also saying "pleas

Re: [Gaim-devel] Re: Gaim-Encryption plugin violates Gaim's license

2003-06-02 Thread Luke Schierer
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:25:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:21:55AM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote: > > > As a preamble if I just gatecrashed your mailbox or mailing list without > > warning, I am the Debian package maintainer for Gaim, as well as a > > frequent contr