Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process [rescinded]

2009-03-25 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello developers, > > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions". > > PROPOSAL START >

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Kurt Roeckx [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:52:22 +0100]: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is > > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed > > changes when in fact it

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > What about: > General Resolution sponsorship requirements sounds like package sponsorship requirements to me. therefore i suggest to be extra clear and change it to 'Requirements for General Resolution Sponsorship'. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is > > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed > > changes w

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed > changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary > will fi

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-24 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed > changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary > will fix t

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello developers, > > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions". > > PROPOSAL START >

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-24 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:44:18PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 24/03/09 at 00:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > PROPOSAL START > > > === > > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > > > Project, whi

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello developers, > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions". > PROPOSAL START >

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

2009-03-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 24/03/09 at 00:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > PROPOSAL START > > === > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > > Project, which have served us well since the first GR vote in 2003, > > with 804 devel