Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead
> > > > of the
> > > > USB attached modem (which
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the
> > > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > This does
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the
> > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of the
> USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
Protocol. How can a Linux Router speek
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> The method described on http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php certainly
> looks like a hack. It basically describes a way to convert a Home model
> to a Pro model without paying. Given
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > Yes, but often the line comes in many meters
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd log
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from the system, and
> the simplest thing is then to run some UTP to
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd logtrend-consolidation p
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
>
> [...]
>
> > dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
>
> Could someone give a pointer where I can
Colin Watson writes:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:56:12PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The build on sparc is due to something else, don't have time to
> > > investigate that right now; mips doesn't seem to have even attempted t
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> I have not closed the bug since point 2) is not fixed yet (will
> be rather quickly). Gee, I do not like people who submit
> zillions of unrelated bugs in one bugreport :-)
You now have the "clone" command to fix this.
http://www.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
>
> efingerd
this bug has been closed already for some time, and the
security is
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:44:32PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
> > because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
>
> This is "had had to go".
> AJ mailed "over the past few weeks". note the plural.
Well, the last RC bug o
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:34:45AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
> > be considered tomorrow.
>
> It also says:
>
> Depends: galeon mozilla
>
> galeon 1.
> As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
> because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
This is "had had to go".
AJ mailed "over the past few weeks". note the plural.
Greetings,
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:12:07PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> > > None of these packages have RC bugs. masqmail itself just has two
> > > important bugs which will
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > kvdr masqmailxtell
> >
> > As much as I like to have woody rele
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > kvdr masqmailxtell
>
> As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
> because I don't understand why masqmail
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> kvdr masqmailxtell
As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
masqmail (- to 0.1.16-2)
* Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Craig Brozefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> me. I did not intend to use the Closed: syntax in the changelog, but
> instead sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with close BUGID as
> described in my copy of bug-maint-mailcontrol.txt which I guess is out
> of date and I should have paid closer attenti
Anthony Towns writes:
> ilisp
>
> These packages will get a brief chance to be reconsidered in the
> next few days, but don't bet too heavily on them making it. From
> this point on, packages that are still in testing that have serious,
> grave or critical bugs that get removed probably won'
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * gs-common's license issues need to be resolved
Just to keep people from wasting their time to fix this: My local
gs-common edition has the following changes:
* debian/control: Add dependency on gsfonts. Rationale: gs is
On Sat 06 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
> dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
Could someone give a pointer where I can found out why pptp
> IIRC galeon is not moved to woody just because it depends on mozilla
> which has an RC bug. Since mozilla is not removed but will be fixed
> before the release (at least that's how I understood Anthony's mail) I
> wonder if galeon then can make it back in. Or did you just removev
> galeon 1.0.3 a
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:56:12PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The build on sparc is due to something else, don't have time to
> > investigate that right now; mips doesn't seem to have even attempted the
> > build.
>
> antlr buil
Just some short questions.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> libqt3-psql
I just came back from vacation and saw that the new qt3 uploads that fix
the problem are still waiting in the queue. Would it be possible to get
this package back into woody if I upload an
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Looking at the build logs for antlr, the jikes bug in question (on
> alpha, right? #123041) has already been fixed. Somebody should
> reschedule that build.
My personal impression is that jikes in sid is very broken.
Some packages that use
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:42:38PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > velocity werken.xpathantlr
>
> These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist
> bugs) but a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does any
> > galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
>
> Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Galeon was unfortunately removed to a RC bug that did apply to a version
in sid, not in woody, t
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 11:22, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> OK. Since the build problems seem to be easily solved (see #141077), I
> hope both mozilla and galeon can be included in woody.
Indeed. aj already knows that I'm on the next plane to Australia if
woody releases without Galeon :)
--
To UNSUB
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually, as always, it'll release when it's ready: if we find that the
> software doesn't meet our expectations on April 30th, you'll find me on
> the ground writhing in pain with leaves, bark and wood all over the place
> [1].
Well
On Apr 06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> pfaedit
The "RC" bug appears to be in an out-of-date version of the package.
Furthermore, it's been closed for over a week...
> popularity-contest
Fixed for several days in NMU.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/
-
Hi Colin!
You wrote:
> galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (>= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
> testing because:
[mozilla doesn't build on hppa and is not yet built on m68k, sparc]
> In other words, it's currently mostly mozilla that's broken, not galeon.
> I guess that if mozilla is fixed then
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 3:42 pm, Will Newton wrote:
> > ilisp
>
ilisp is in fact fixed, it's just the bug has not been closed yet due to a
typo in the changelog. I'll email the maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
> velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist bugs) but
a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone who knows jikes have
any idea if this can be fixed soon, or is it a bi
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
> be considered tomorrow.
It also says:
Depends: galeon mozilla
galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (>= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
testing because:
m
I demand that Anthony Towns may or may not have written...
[snip]
> I'm becoming increasingly confident in woody's release readiness. So, to go
> out on a limb:
> Debian 3.0 (codenamed woody) will release on May 1st, 2002.
Oh good. What will it be releasing? :-)
--
| Darren Salt |
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> lclint
I'm working on an NMU just now.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydr
Hi Petter!
You wrote:
> [Bas Zoetekouw]
> > Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> > are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
>
> Did you check
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon>?
Yes, of course. It
[Bas Zoetekouw]
> Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Did you check
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon>?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding
42 matches
Mail list logo
