On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:10:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Well, at least it is packaged and easy to setup (IMO).
>
> Where is it ?
>
> $ apt-cache search turtle
> ucblogo - a dialect of lisp using turtle graphics famous for teaching kids.
> $
It's available at http://savannah.gnu.org
Hi,
Le Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:31:17PM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann écrivait:
> > What became of turtle -- do the Hurd people still use that?
> >
>
> I still use it, but the other Hurd builders will use buildd.
> Turtle has some nice concepts, but it needs a major rewrite, and
> maybe a redesign as w
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sort of. One could request it through the admin interface. The autobuilder
> > will only recompile something if it sees a need for it (for example, if I
> > upload a new version of a library that drops an old binary package and
> > adds a new one, the
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> On 17 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > In addition to this, have you considered adding support for periodic
> > rebuilding of existing packages e.g. when buildd is idle?
>
> Sort of. One could request it through the admin interface. Th
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:12:10PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 10:44, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Well, my project goes much further, it is basically a "generic"
> > autobuilder with a plugin for .dsc/.deb (just like APT is a generic
> > package library with plugins for Debia
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 10:44, Simon Richter wrote:
> Well, my project goes much further, it is basically a "generic"
> autobuilder with a plugin for .dsc/.deb (just like APT is a generic
> package library with plugins for Debian).
What became of turtle -- do the Hurd people still use that?
p.
--
On 17 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
> In addition to this, have you considered adding support for periodic
> rebuilding of existing packages e.g. when buildd is idle?
Sort of. One could request it through the admin interface. The autobuilder
will only recompile something if it sees a need for it (
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My idea is to have a web page with current "problems". A problem could be
> a package not building, an uninstallable package, etc. The layout will be
> much like the BTS, just that the only method to get rid of a "problem" is
> to solve it (i.e. there is
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Well, my project goes much further, it is basically a "generic"
> > autobuilder with a plugin for .dsc/.deb (just like APT is a generic
> > package library with plugins for Debian).
> The most lacking part is the problem of source not building.
> bui
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Anyway, "pbuilder" is one such project, that seems to be
> > working almost. It rebuilds almost all of Debian archive now.
> > Few more quirks to go.
> Well, my project goes much further, it is basically a "generic"
> autobuilder with a
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
> > rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should be ready for general use in
> > about three to six months [...].
> Anyway, "pbuilder" is one such project, that seems to be
> work
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
>
> Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
> rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should be ready for general use in
> about three t
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> have not tried to use it yet. I won't be able to do much more till
> June, but I'll have ple
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
[buildd in C++]
> Thet sounds very cool. Would you like any help with this?
Difficult, since if this gets to be my project, I'm supposed to do it
without outside help. :-/
> At the very
> least, I can help document it and fix bugs (I can write troff, tex
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
>
> Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
> rewrite in C++, based on APT, which shoul
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:52:48AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> > don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> > have not tried to use it
Le Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh écrivait:
> Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> have not tried to use it yet. I won't be able to do much more till
> June, but I'll have
On 14 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should be ready for general use in
about three to six months (hopefully our IT d
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> have not tried to use it yet. I won't be able to do much more till
> June, but I'll have plenty o
The buildd source available from :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/CVS
(module wanna-build) does not have a functional debian directory. I
have also not been able to contact the maintainers so far--is this
source actively maintained?
I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper
20 matches
Mail list logo
