Adeodato Simó writes:
> * Roger Leigh [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:32:36 +]:
>
>> However, I think a good first step would for both dak and wanna-build
>> to share as much of their schemas as is reasonably possible. To that
>> end, I'll update my wanna-build schema to use the same naming as is
>> us
* Roger Leigh [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:32:36 +]:
> However, I think a good first step would for both dak and wanna-build
> to share as much of their schemas as is reasonably possible. To that
> end, I'll update my wanna-build schema to use the same naming as is
> used in projectb as far as is pra
>> I am not a dak hacker, nor an ftpteam or wanna-build guy. That being
>> said, it looks like a lot of the information you store and the functions
>> for comparison look an awful lot like the stuff dak currently has. Does
>> it make sense to consolidate, and expand dak to handle the extra thing
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:04:13PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
> > Dear all,
>
>
>
> > We would be grateful for any comments you might have, particularly
> > if you have used the existing wanna-build and can see any defects,
> > omissions, or any s
This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
> Dear all,
> We would be grateful for any comments you might have, particularly
> if you have used the existing wanna-build and can see any defects,
> omissions, or any suggestions for anything we missed or could
> implement in a more optimal fashi
Dear all,
Over the last few weeks I, with the help of HE and others on
#debian-buildd, have been developing a PostgreSQL schema[1] for
wanna build[2]. The intent is to replace the existing setup of
multiple MLDBM databases with an extensible and flexible
relational database for use both by wanna-
6 matches
Mail list logo
