Hi!
On Wed, 2022-07-06 at 05:13:05 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> As per Debian policy §3.5, and given dpkg “Essential: yes” nature, I'm
> bringing up the following potential additions to dpkg's Pre-Depends,
> and whether there is consensus about each of them individually and
> independently.
Give
On Wed, 2022-07-06 at 17:30:22 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Unless I'm mistaken if dpkg dep on libcap(2) and libaudit, then dpkg
> > would transitively dep on both libcap(2) and libcap-ng which seems
> > suboptimal.
>
> Yes, but its an internal implementation detail, so libaudit could be
> swit
On Wed, 2022-07-06 at 16:45:18 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:13:05AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [...]
> > * libaudit-dev
> > - Rationale:
> > This could allow to add Linux audit support to dpkg on package action
> > events. I've got a branch that might n
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:13:05AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
[...]
> * libaudit-dev
> - Rationale:
> This could allow to add Linux audit support to dpkg on package action
> events. I've got a branch that might need minor polishing, but could
> otherwise be merged.
>
> - Ess
Hi!
As per Debian policy §3.5, and given dpkg “Essential: yes” nature, I'm
bringing up the following potential additions to dpkg's Pre-Depends,
and whether there is consensus about each of them individually and
independently.
* libmd-dev
- Rationale:
src:dpkg currently has its embedded MD5
5 matches
Mail list logo
