> > By the way debedit spew some debugging output at me and seems also a bit
> > laggy. Is it still beta? (:
> I was unable to find debedit, are you speaking about debtags-edit? I am
Yes, he was talking about debtags-edit, as the mail he replies to
states.
> not sure if it is still beta, but it
why not define "multimedia" for all sound, video, voip and so on stuff?
Juergen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Kern wrote:
> I do not know if there were previous discussions on this topic, but the
> new section I propose would seperate media players from image processing
> tools. Plugins for those players which are currently put into "libs"
> should als
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> the right thing to do would be to switch from sections, to keywords, so
> that kmplayer could live in sound + video + kde, instead of multimedia
> that is not very informative.
I want to stress what Adrian and Benjamin said a bi
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Is it already used in any package management tools? Or is the debedit
> GUI currently the only program using the preliminary database?
There is a library being implemented (libapt-front.alioth.debian.org) to
wrap libapt and also inc
Hello,
> Is it already used in any package management tools? Or is the debedit
> GUI currently the only program using the preliminary database?
As far as I know it is hidden deep into synaptic, but I don't know if
the support is currently broken or not. Also there is a cool search
application cal
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Exactly. The debtags system is quite mature now - what it still lacks is
a complete set of data. If you want to help completing the data, you
should consider downloading debtags-edit. Also have a look at
http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ for more details.
Is it already us
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:14 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:00 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on
> > > which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde, or
> > > whatever
Hello
> > > the right thing to do would be to switch from sections, to keywords, so
> > > that kmplayer could live in sound + video + kde, instead of multimedia
> > > that is not very informative.
> >
> > Now this, I'd second :)
> >
> > (OTOH, I'm not volunteering to implement support for this, I
On Friday 27 May 2005 04:09 am, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> though, that would mean that 'sound' won't have that many package. so
> maybe we should rename sound into multimedia and populate it with video
> players too ?
It might make sense -- but on the other hand, given that our sections will
be
On Friday 27 May 2005 14.15, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:13 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > the right thing to do would be to switch from sections, to keywords, so
> > that kmplayer could live in sound + video + kde, instead of multimedia
> > that is not very informative.
>
>
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:13 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Vendredi 27 Mai 2005 14:00, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> > Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on
> > > which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde,
> > > or whatev
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:00 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on
> > which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde, or
> > whatever).
>
> Please see it from a user's point of view. If one wants a
Le Vendredi 27 Mai 2005 14:00, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on
> > which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde,
> > or whatever).
>
> Please see it from a user's point of view. If one wants a m
Gergely Nagy wrote:
Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on
which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde, or
whatever).
Please see it from a user's point of view. If one wants a media player
why should (s)he look in "gnome" or "kde"? And I person
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 07:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:17 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > > El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió:
> > > > multimedia seems more appropriat
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:17 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió:
> > > multimedia seems more appropriate. most of the video player actually are
> > > music player too, and
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:17 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió:
> > multimedia seems more appropriate. most of the video player actually are
> > music player too, and some music player can show video with appropriate
> > plugins (xmms e.
El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió:
> multimedia seems more appropriate. most of the video player actually are
> music player too, and some music player can show video with appropriate
> plugins (xmms e.g.)
>
> though, that would mean that 'sound' won't have that many package.
Hi,
> maybe we should rename sound into multimedia and populate it with video
> players too ?
Seconded.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le Vendredi 27 Mai 2005 12:40, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Dear Debian fellows,
>
> when does a group of packages warrant the introduction of a new
> section? At least I could request some comments without any
> obligation.
>
> I know of some users which were distracted by our "graphics" section,
> as
Dear Debian fellows,
when does a group of packages warrant the introduction of a new section?
At least I could request some comments without any obligation.
I know of some users which were distracted by our "graphics" section, as
they searched for multimedia or more precisely movie players a
22 matches
Mail list logo
