Re: Re: RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools

2015-07-29 Thread Ian Jackson
picca writes ("Re: Re: RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools"): > It seems to me but I can be wrong that the dgit informations stored > under .git/dgit are sort of meta data which point to git ref > corresponding to packages uploaded into Debian. Don&

Re: Re: RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools

2015-07-29 Thread picca
Hello > > Yes and it is nice to have meta data (the dgit things) rerpresenting > > the packages which can be shared between derivatives. > I don't understand what you are referring to here. It seems to me but I can be wrong that the dgit informations stored under .git/dgit are sort of meta data

Re: RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools

2015-07-29 Thread Ian Jackson
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel writes ("RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools"): > > dgit is a step in this direction. > > Yes and it is nice to have meta data (the dgit things) rerpresenting > the packages which can be shared between derivatives. I don&

RE:RE:Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools

2015-07-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> dgit is a step in this direction. Yes and it is nice to have meta data (the dgit things) rerpresenting the packages which can be shared between derivatives. > I'm not sure I entirely understand your situation, but: Yes I was a bit laid at this moment :) > If you are a downstream, there is no