In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I was looking for a more generic approach, I guess. One that breaks down
> the basic concepts, caveats, concerns, etc. Looking at it now, I realize
> Free Software and commercial software will have different emphasises, even
> at this level.
For one
>
> I take it from your "exporting our code" statement that your software
> will be Free Software? (It makes a difference because your packaging
> strategy will be different depending on whether or not the software is
> com
>
> --
> Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
> WWW:
Gilbert, Joseph wrote:
> We are looking at now exporting our code and making it useful to a wider
> client base. This obviously will mean that the software packages will have
> to be built as .deb, .rpms, tarballs and whatever else will be needed. I
> have been told that I will likely be respons
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 15:19 -0800, Gilbert, Joseph wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I work for a software company that up until now has developed software,
> mostly written in Java, that is deployed inhouse to servers that are
> administering internally.
>
> We are looking at now exporting our code and maki
4 matches
Mail list logo
