Re: libecw

Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > I'm not sure if it's license ( > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered > > free enough to be in main: Some feedback from upstream is in this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/2005-August/thread.html#1

Re: libecw

Scripsit Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm not sure if it's license ( > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered > free enough to be in main: [...] > ii) When modifications to the Software are released under this license, a > non-exclusive royalty-free ri

Re: libecw

On 1/12/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression > > for > > applications licensed under a GNU General Public style license ("GPL") is > > governed by the "ECW SDK PUBLIC USE LICENSE AGREEMENT". > > Not su

Re: libecw

Miriam Ruiz wrote: > I'm not sure if it's license ( > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered > free enough to be in main: FYI, the right place to ask this is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moving it over there. Full-quoting because of this. Summary: I don't believe this is

Re: libecw

El Jueves 12 Enero 2006 10:58, Miriam Ruiz escribió: > I'm not sure if it's license ( > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered > free enough to be in main: And in non-free ? > > Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression > for appl

RE: libecw

I'm not sure if it's license ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered free enough to be in main: Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression for applications licensed under a GNU General Public style license ("GPL") is governed by