On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 07:41:45PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm very happy that you took the package, because I'm heavyly dependend
> from it. In my humble opinion maintaining is not so hard, because
> the program compiled well in all version I compiled myself (sometimes
> there where reasons
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:53:44PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> Raster and I had philosophical differences, which made the maintainer/author
> relationship hard. Give it a shot, if you can't do it someone else will step
> in.
Same reason here. Just took me a few months to really realize it =)
On 27-Jan-99 Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The right answer is "hell no" (=
>
> I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a
> boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :)
>
> -Ossama
Raster and I had philosophical differences, which made the maintainer/author
rel
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Ossama Othman wrote:
> I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a
> boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :)
I'm very happy that you took the package, because I'm heavyly dependend
from it. In my humble opinion maintaining is not so hard, bec
Hi,
> The right answer is "hell no" (=
I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a
boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :)
-Ossama
__
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44 7
On 27-Jan-99 Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two imlib maintainers listed on the "People Behind Debian" web
> page, Brian and Shaleh. Is that right? :)
>
> Thanks,
> -Ossama
>
The right answer is "hell no" (=
The detailed answer is I used to maintain it and hamm still contains the
p
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:14:57PM -0600, Ossama Othman wrote:
> There are two imlib maintainers listed on the "People Behind Debian" web
> page, Brian and Shaleh. Is that right? :)
No. Shaleh was the maintainer before me.
7 matches
Mail list logo
