'Hamish Moffatt wrote:'
>
>> Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> dome-4.60-1
>
>Compiled fine but appears to segfault on execution.
Hmm, are there problems with g++? I'll be upgrading to hamm RSN and
hope to have time before the code freeze to deal with this ...
--
Christopher J. Fearnley
>
> > Igor Grobman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > grmonitor-0.53-2
>
> The package says Christoph Lameter is the maintainer.
> Good luck to Igor, it looks like some work. I tried to compile it
> just now.
I did not see a reason to reupload the new version of the package (this was
before libc6 conve
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Okay I'll do that and name it 2.01-8.2. Also I found the problem with my
> first upload. It had a distribution entry "stable unstable" which is
> absolutely wrong (shouldn't use cut and paste without checking first).
> This package m
hael Meskes
> Subject: Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-06
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 08:51:38AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Now that's a problem. I did the same. I also did fix all open bugs
> in
> > lshell. A few minutes ago I tried to see which version is on master
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 08:51:38AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Now that's a problem. I did the same. I also did fix all open bugs in
> lshell. A few minutes ago I tried to see which version is on master and
> found none in incoming, none in REJECT and no new one in hamm. What
> happened? What do
| Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -Original Message-
> From: Hamish Moffatt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 1997 3:16 AM
> To: Richard Braakman
> Subject: Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-06
>
> > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, Dec 06, 1997 at 09:50:59PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> There are now 143 packages in the list, with upgrades on the way for 6
> more. Progress seems to have stalled on this front. Perhaps the
> remaining packages are truly uninteresting :-)
It could be that, but also there are some
On Mon, Dec 8 1997 0:49 +0100 Richard Braakman writes:
> David Frey wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 6 1997 21:50 +0100 Richard Braakman writes:
> > > David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > pax-2.1-3(Not DFSG-compliant?)
> >
> > Hmm. I uploaded pax a few weeks ago into non-free (this was Mark H
David Frey wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6 1997 21:50 +0100 Richard Braakman writes:
> > David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > pax-2.1-3(Not DFSG-compliant?)
>
> Hmm. I uploaded pax a few weeks ago into non-free (this was Mark H. Colburn's
> version)
Let's see... I checked my archives, and I f
On Sat, Dec 6 1997 21:50 +0100 Richard Braakman writes:
...
> David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> pax-2.1-3(Not DFSG-compliant?)
Hmm. I uploaded pax a few weeks ago into non-free (this was Mark H. Colburn's
version)
But anyway,
if I manage it to compile the Open-BSD pax, we'll have a
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since XEmacs-20.3 has finally been released on Nov 30 it would be
> really nice to have this included in Debian-2.0 instead of the now
> obsolete XEmacs-20.2, especially since some nasty bugs have been fixed
> with this release.
Please tell me that the co
On Sat, 6 Dec 1997, Richard Braakman wrote:
> (orphan):
> addressbook-0.6.1-2
Is anyone working on addressbook? If not, maybe I'll give it a shot and
see if I can package it. There's a new upstream version 0.7. :)
Thanks. :)
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Civil Eng
Hi!
Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> xcdroast-0.96-1
Just a quick note to discourage non-maintainer uploads:
I am still waiting for the 0.96c release of xcdroast. I've got
a packaged version of the fourth beta which seems to work just
fine.
Wichert.
13 matches
Mail list logo
