On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:35:46 -0700
Kushal Koolwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For now should we just keep track of the EeePC?
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC/Status
I can't answer the "big picture" questions you're asking. As for
the Eee stuff, expect on d-d-a a new "Bits from the Debian E
> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:11:31 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Intel Atom Processor
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>> The Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) effort is one to provide a good desktop
>>
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:29:48 +0200
Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> many thanks for your reply. Your web sites are indeed what I wanted to see,
> possibly a bit too far away from John Doe who just bought such a machine
> as a Newbie Linux user,
Naturally. The site is made by and for t
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
> > The Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) effort is one to provide a good desktop
> > experience on subnotebooks / UMPCs by using a different desktop
> > representation of the same apps.
> Hmm..I think the following text confused me from this website:
> http://w
Dear Ben and dear Jose,
Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:09:57 +0200
> Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The EeePCs are sold throughout large resellers (Saturn, Staples, ...) in
>> Germany and at least until the new ones get out they all ship with
>> Debian - perfect
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:09:57 +0200
Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The EeePCs are sold throughout large resellers (Saturn, Staples, ...) in
> Germany and at least until the new ones get out they all ship with
> Debian - perfectly visible to every potential customer passing by. I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>> I got your point, you mean we(group of debian) should make a blueprint for
>>> some Device like Netbook / UMPC /> MIDs.
>> Yes. Exactly!
>>
>>> what is your blueprint based debian like?
>> At this po
Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>> I got your point, you mean we(group of debian) should make a blueprint for
>> some Device like Netbook / UMPC /> MIDs.
> Yes. Exactly!
>
>> what is your blueprint based debian like?
> At this point of time I am not sure what is going to look like. May be it
> will help
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Would it be wrong to ship different flavors of the Debian CDs based on
> various upstream software?
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
--
On 22/07/08 at 17:58 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Yeah, great idea! Let's start Debian subdistros for every specific use
> > one can think of. This whole "universal operating system" idea is so
> > old. What about gebian, kebian, xebian?
>
> Would it
sts.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Intel Atom Processor
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>> The atom seem to be x86-compatible. so what is the issue that would stop
>>> it from any i386-based Debian package?
>> That's true. But it seems that these
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Yeah, great idea! Let's start Debian subdistros for every specific use
> one can think of. This whole "universal operating system" idea is so
> old. What about gebian, kebian, xebian?
Would it be wrong to ship different flavors of the Debian CDs based
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
> > The atom seem to be x86-compatible. so what is the issue that would stop
> > it from any i386-based Debian package?
> That's true. But it seems that these processors are low power and are
> made for Ultra mobile PC (UMPC) and netbooks and to take adva
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I might be wrong but I thought the atom CPU would add 64bit
> support. As such the Debian amd64 port should work as well.
According to Wikipedia and the linked Intel sheets, only the desktop
version has 64-bit support.
Gabor
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Kushal Koolwal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And therefore I was thinking if Debian Project is planning to natively
>> support these?
>
> I noticed this page being created on the wiki recently:
>
> http://wiki.debian.o
On 22/07/08 at 01:23 -0700, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
> >maybe we can start a project named mobian (mobile debian) ?
> Yes this would be awesome. This will bring Debian up to the speed of likes of
> Ubuntu. I would be happy to assist in this with whatever knowledge and skills
> I have.
Yeah, great i
ge and skills I
have.
Thanks for effort and initiative.
Kushal Koolwal
I do blog at http://blogs.koolwal.net/
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:30:37 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel Atom Processor
Hmm. I got your point, you m
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Kushal Koolwal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, Ubuntu started the netbook-remix program to port applications
> for Intel Atom processors based on the Intel's moblin project
> (http://www.moblin.org/).
> https://edge.launchpad.net/netbook-remix
None of
therefore I was wondering if Debian community is planning to have something
like this.
Thank you once again for your time.
Kushal Koolwal
I do blog at http://blogs.koolwal.net/
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:06:47 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Int
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Kushal Koolwal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And therefore I was thinking if Debian Project is planning to natively
> support these?
I noticed this page being created on the wiki recently:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAcerOne
Looks like at least one person plans
20 matches
Mail list logo
