Re: R³ by default: not for bookworm

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 03:58:57AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 03:39:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > A few packages had a value of R³ other than "no" / "binary-targets", > > these are deprecated now; bugs filed. > > Deprecated by who or what? I had the impression https:

Re: R³ by default: not for bookworm

2022-09-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 03:39:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > A few packages had a value of R³ other than "no" / "binary-targets", > these are deprecated now; bugs filed. Deprecated by who or what? > The process of adding/changing a field in "control" differs between the > three source format

R³ by default: not for bookworm

2022-09-17 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! A few months ago I ran a test rebuild of packages that lack Rules-Requires-Root settings. Alas, I've forgotten to post the results, doing so now. A few packages had a value of R³ other than "no" / "binary-targets", these are deprecated now; bugs filed. This leaves three states: "no", "binary