On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:03:44AM +, John O Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 05:38:36 Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I don't have any concrete recommendations for how to take this into
> > account, but I certainly think that a 14-day waiting period for
> > packages like these is excessive.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, John O Sullivan wrote:
> On a slightly related topic, packages that are updated everyday are a
> big headache for those of us that are living at the end of a modem,
> because we have to update many 10's of packages a day == lots of
> downloading. Its not a problem these days, b
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 05:38:36 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Consider that when I manage to hork up X, I know about it within
> hours of
> dinstall. Likewise, a few days ago when Wichert busted the vim
> postinst,
> he was told about it quite fast indeed.
>
> I don't have any concrete recommendation
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:15:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The idea is that for a package to get into testing it should:
>
> * be synchronised across architectures
> * have all its dependencies met, and not break the dependencies
> of other packages
> * not have any
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 02:04:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
> Anthony> Well, even Joey Hess has slipped up in his religious debconf
> Anthony> uploads and had four or five delays longer than a fortnight
> Anthony> between updates. Basically, though,
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Well, even Joey Hess has slipped up in his religious debconf
Anthony> uploads and had four or five delays longer than a fortnight
Anthony> between updates. Basically, though, at some point the
Anthony> maintainer has to decide "I'm happy with this
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 01:22:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> then you need to either update sparc and alpha, or you need to bug the
> ftpadmins to remove the binaries from those architectures if the package
Actually If I look at the ftp.denian.org Bug List there are quite a lot of
open bugs, a
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 12:14:01PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 1. What arches are required (supposing the package is arch: any) so that
>the package can go in testing ? Is arm required ?
It's a little more dynamic than that, actually. Basically, all you need
to do is make sure that the pac
Hi,
now that testing is in place I have several questions and remarks. Maybe
it would be great to put such a FAQ (I remember seeing a short one on DWN)
somewhere online with a link from the developers corner on the website.
1. What arches are required (supposing the package is arch: any) so that
9 matches
Mail list logo
