> .elc files compiled with emacs 19.z with z >= 29 will only work on
> emacs 19.29 or later.
Doesn't setting byte-compile-compatibility help with this, or is it
too much of a performance loss?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Troubl
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please also involve the people who maintain emacs lisp
> packages as well, since the decision shall have major impact on us.
Oh, of course. I certainly meant to include you.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04
Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> In a little while I need to have a discussion with the other two
Rob> emacs maintainers to see what they think (and are willing to
Rob> try). But first I want to make sure we have a clear idea of what
Rob> the issues and possibilities ar
"Larry 'Daffy' Daffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "APH" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> APH> BTW, are .elc files arch-dependant or arch-indep? I've always
> APH> wondered about this.
>
> .elc files are architecture independent. However, they are not
> emacs-indepe
> "APH" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
APH> BTW, are .elc files arch-dependant or arch-indep? I've always
APH> wondered about this.
.elc files are architecture independent. However, they are not
emacs-independent. What happens is:
.elc files compiled with xemacs 19.x or em
"Adam P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rob, you're talking about moving Xemacs arch-independant files from /usr/
> lib/xemacs-XX.XX to /usr/share, right?
No, this is only for emacs20, James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
maintains xemacs.
> I think this is a good idea. When we do this fo
"Adam P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, are .elc files arch-dependant or arch-indep? I've always
> wondered about this.
They're architecture independent.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [
[You (Rob Browning)]
>Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As the current emacs package installs its libs into
>> /usr/lib/emacs/19.34/..., will moving this below /usr/share break other
>> packages?
>
>I'll certainly make sure that's not a problem before I do it, but so
>far, I doubt i
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the current emacs package installs its libs into
> /usr/lib/emacs/19.34/..., will moving this below /usr/share break other
> packages?
I'll certainly make sure that's not a problem before I do it, but so
far, I doubt it will be. I don't think th
On 16 Dec 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> The newer emacs source wants to put some files in /usr/share/emacs and
> /usr/libexec/emacs by default. The emacs 19 package put all these
> files together in /usr/lib/.
>
> I would assume /usr/share is now OK since it's in the FSSTND (to some
> extent) and
The newer emacs source wants to put some files in /usr/share/emacs and
/usr/libexec/emacs by default. The emacs 19 package put all these
files together in /usr/lib/.
I would assume /usr/share is now OK since it's in the FSSTND (to some
extent) and other packages are using it, but what about /usr
11 matches
Mail list logo
