Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-11 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > > >It is not only that - It is because apt-get is an infrastructure >manager, not an individual package manager. dpkg does work on single >packages, but apt-get works on the whole collection - and it could >lead to inconsistencies if you let apt-get do a half-assed job and

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-10 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Daniel J. Axtens dijo [Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:36:06PM +0800]: > > and not > > "apt-get upgrade " > > Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, > not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to > overload the upgrade command. It is not only that -

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Friday 06 May 2005 06:04 am, Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: > Yes, ok for that. But when I want to upgrade a package, it is not really > logical to use "install", because the package is already installed, no ? Yes. Daniel -- /--- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Guido Heumann a écrit : >Martin Braure de Calignon schrieb: > > >>Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : >> >> >> >> and not "apt-get upgrade " >>>Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, >>>not just one package. My guess is that the dev

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Guido Heumann
Martin Braure de Calignon schrieb: > Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : > > >>>and not >>>"apt-get upgrade " >>> >>> >> >>Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, >>not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to >>overload the upgrade command. >> >>HT

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : >>and not >>"apt-get upgrade " >> >> > >Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, >not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to >overload the upgrade command. > >HTH, >Daniel > > > Yes, ok for that. But when I wan

Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-05 Thread Daniel J. Axtens
> and not > "apt-get upgrade " Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the upgrade command. HTH, Daniel -- Neuronstorm: neuronstorm.sourceforge.net The Neuronstorm Blog: leinad-golb.blogsp

Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-05 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello DDs, I wonder why when you want to upgrade one package, you have to do : "apt-get install " and not "apt-get upgrade " Is there a reason for that ? It makes me more sens to upgrade the package when I want to upgrade it... No ? Thanks - -- Mar