Re: Question about update-initramfs

2013-01-20 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
On 19/01/2013 19:51, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 07:34:15PM +0100, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: >> ---8<-- >> uswsusp (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low >> >> NOTE, by default update-initramfs -u only updates the initramfs of the >> latest kernel. This can

Re: Question about update-initramfs

2013-01-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 07:34:15PM +0100, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: > ---8<-- > uswsusp (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low > > NOTE, by default update-initramfs -u only updates the initramfs of the > latest kernel. This can lead to incompatibilities between s2disk and > re

Re: Question about update-initramfs

2013-01-19 Thread Russ Allbery
"Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" writes: > Then, what should I do? What is the correct option? > 1. update-initramfs -u > 2. update-initramfs -u -k all I believe the current behavior (without -k all) is more correct. At least, it would be my preference. I think my personal use case is relatively

Question about update-initramfs

2013-01-19 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
Hi, I have a question about update-initramfs and the bug #619354 [1] The bug report includes: ---8<-- The README.Debian file can now tell users to use: update-initramfs -u -k all to update the initramfs for all their kernels instead of update-initramfs -u which is what it s