Re: Putting distributed-net back up for adoption

1999-05-18 Thread Adam Klein
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 05:41:01PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Adam Klein wrote: > > number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird > > behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). > > Really? That's odd since it is a statically linked binary. I don't see how > libc could

Re: Putting distributed-net back up for adoption

1999-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Klein wrote: > number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird > behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). Really? That's odd since it is a statically linked binary. I don't see how libc could affect it. -- see shy jo

Putting distributed-net back up for adoption

1999-05-17 Thread Adam Klein
When Joey Hess decided to get rid of all his non-free packages, I snapped up distributed-net, but I was a bit too hasty. It has a rather large number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). And being a binary-only package, i