Re: Proposing a new field in the source control data

"Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Ben Finney > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those pieces of data are called "fields". Just like in RFC2822 > > messages or HTTP responses. > > Thanks for the correction. I always think of headers, because one > u

Re: Proposing a new field in the source control data (was: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs)

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those pieces of data are called "fields". Just like in RFC2822 > messages or HTTP responses. Thanks for the correction. I always think of headers, because one usually refers to rfc2822 "fields" as "headers", I didn't know

Proposing a new field in the source control data (was: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs)

"Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Following the trend to add metadata to the debian/control file that > allows for the creation of new and powerful tools, I thought about the > usefulness of a header that'd allow to automatically relate to > upstream bug trackers. Those pieces of d