Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained > since 2015 [2][3]. > > The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to > nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python st

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-21 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 16:04:36 +0300 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and > unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. > > The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to > switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python stand

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-21 Thread Antonio Valentino
Dear Dmitry, Il 21/08/22 15:04, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: Hi, nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python standard library

Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-21 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi, nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python standard library [6]. There is a script called nose2pytest [7] which can assist