On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:17:38PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:35:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > > 1) Setup toshutils-gtk2 to compile binaries to have different names and
> > > > maybe not have them Conflict.
> > > > 2) Have both packages use the same binary
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:35:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:59:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:26PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > I am working on taking over toshutils. One of the things I would like
> > > to do is i
Le samedi 28 mai 2005 à 08:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> Good. That is what I wanted to do, but I wasn't sure how it would go
> over. Second question, how do handle the version numbering? Increment
> only the Debian part of the version and include the GTK2 patch as a
> Debian patch?
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:59:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:26PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I am working on taking over toshutils. One of the things I would like
> > to do is incorporate a patch that updates it from GTK+ to GTK2. The
> > patch came fr
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:26PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I am working on taking over toshutils. One of the things I would like
> to do is incorporate a patch that updates it from GTK+ to GTK2. The
> patch came from ALT Linux.
> Up to now I have been considering keeping the toshutils
I am working on taking over toshutils. One of the things I would like
to do is incorporate a patch that updates it from GTK+ to GTK2. The
patch came from ALT Linux.
Up to now I have been considering keeping the toshutils package as it is
and then adding a second binary package from the same sour
6 matches
Mail list logo
