On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:30:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, LaMont Jones wrote:
>
> > > Additionally I see that you did other changes to unix/tkstepConfig.sh that
> > > aren't even mentioned in the changelog!
> >
> > Here is the complete diff between what I uploaded, and wha
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Additionally I see that you did other changes to unix/tkstepConfig.sh that
> > aren't even mentioned in the changelog!
>
> Here is the complete diff between what I uploaded, and what was in the
> archive. Dunno what change you're seeing in tkstepConfig.
> Additionally I see that you did other changes to unix/tkstepConfig.sh that
> aren't even mentioned in the changelog!
Here is the complete diff between what I uploaded, and what was in the
archive. Dunno what change you're seeing in tkstepConfig.sh, but it
was there in 4p2-4.
lamont
===
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tag 126700 + fixed
> Bug#126700: tkstep8.0: never removes alternative
> Tags added: fixed
Why on earth do you make a NMU for my package less than 24 hours after the
original bug report and w
4 matches
Mail list logo
