Le Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:23:37PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Ever since dpkg started using liblzma directly (dpkg 1.16.4), the xz
> command is no longer needed in a minimal Debian system. Based on its
> list of reverse-dependencies, it would presumably even be safe to
> lower its prior
(please direct replies to debian-devel only)
Ever since dpkg started using liblzma directly (dpkg 1.16.4), the xz
command is no longer needed in a minimal Debian system. Based on its
list of reverse-dependencies, it would presumably even be safe to
lower its priority to optional.
I think "standa
2 matches
Mail list logo
