On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 08:01:37AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/24/2013 07:55 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> >>Here I assume that U.S. law is not so draconian that it can require
> >>someone who has contributed to Debian (and w
On 08/24/2013 07:55 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here I assume that U.S. law is not so draconian that it can require
someone who has contributed to Debian (and who is therefore
trusted) to continue doing so.
Don't be too sure. The own
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
...snip..
>
> Here I assume that U.S. law is not so draconian that it can require someone
> who has contributed to Debian (and who is therefore trusted) to continue
> doing so.
Don't be too sure. The owner of, I believe,
On 24/08/13 22:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thomas Hood writes:
>
>> If a Debian contributor were faced with a demand to do something that
>> undermines the privacy or other interests of Debian users then I would
>> hope and expect that the contributor would choose instead to cease being
>> a contri
Thomas Hood writes:
> If a Debian contributor were faced with a demand to do something that
> undermines the privacy or other interests of Debian users then I would
> hope and expect that the contributor would choose instead to cease being
> a contributor. Were he not to do so then he would have
"We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community.
We will place their interests first in our priorities."
If a Debian contributor were faced with a demand to do something that
undermines the privacy or other interests of Debian users then I would hope
and expect that th
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 14:51 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hello all,
> Prism, NSA, Guardian etc. - I assume all of you have been following
> these reports, and otherwise you definitely should start reading the
> news.
>
> One thing that apparently has been happening a lot these days are
> secret
+++ Erich Schubert [2013-08-24 14:51 +0200]:
> What I'd like to see is that for all packages (at least for all
> security relevant packages, including kernel, SSH, GPG, OpenSSL) every
> package is compiled multiple times, and checksums to verify that none
> of the build systems were compromised.
Hello all,
Prism, NSA, Guardian etc. - I assume all of you have been following
these reports, and otherwise you definitely should start reading the
news.
One thing that apparently has been happening a lot these days are
secret court orders in the U.S. For example Google apparently was
forced to in
9 matches
Mail list logo
