Re: Preliminary intent to package - enlightenment

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are several problems with the packaging of enlightenment. It's > menuing system is *not* easy to integrate with debian menu. This is simply > because of the flexible and highly detailed syntax it uses. It is not > modular in any way. A prelimina

Re: Preliminary intent to package - enlightenment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sun, 3 May 1998, Jules Bean wrote: > --On Sun, May 3, 1998 5:26 pm +0100 "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi there... > > > > Anyone out there already grabbed the enlightenment package, or have a > reason > > why it shouldn't be in slink? I

Re: Preliminary intent to package - enlightenment

--On Sun, May 3, 1998 5:26 pm +0100 "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there... > > Anyone out there already grabbed the enlightenment package, or have a reason > why it shouldn't be in slink? If not, I hereby announce intent to package > enlightenment for slink/main. Oops. I withdr

Preliminary intent to package - enlightenment

Hi there... Anyone out there already grabbed the enlightenment package, or have a reason why it shouldn't be in slink? If not, I hereby announce intent to package enlightenment for slink/main. Subject to me first registering succesfully as a developer. Yours, Jules Bean /+