Re: Possible bug in policy?

2019-10-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Abou Al Montacir writes: > Can you please see thebelow mail and confirm there is a real bug? > On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 22:22 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: >> The issue is that I copied some code from the Debian policy manual [3] and >> that code was wrong: >> The given example is missing closin

Possible bug in policy?

2019-10-24 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Dear all, Can you please see thebelow mail and confirm there is a real bug? On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 22:22 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Hi Jan, Hi Andreas, > > > both contains the same file, namely > > /usr/lib/lazarus/2.0.2/components/IdeInspector/ideinspector.lpk > > and removing it from one

Re: Possible bug

2017-06-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Alessio Abrugiati wrote: > Hi, I found an error in installing a live 9.0.1 but only with qemu, with > qemu not working the mirror part. Please file an installation report using these instructions: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/apas04.html.en -- b

Possible bug

2017-06-25 Thread Alessio Abrugiati
Hi, I found an error in installing a live 9.0.1 but only with qemu, with qemu not working the mirror part. In qemu i tried the netinst version instead works.

Re: (Possible) bug in fglrx dependencies in Sid(Unstable)

2014-08-11 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:02:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Well that's: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754249 Ah that explains why it tries to get removed. > Instead of trying to mix things up, you probably should be using the > free driver. Until the proprietary one

Re: (Possible) bug in fglrx dependencies in Sid(Unstable)

2014-08-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Charlie Brown (2014-08-09): > Hi, > I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed. > It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but > xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search > in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-a

(Possible) bug in fglrx dependencies in Sid(Unstable)

2014-08-09 Thread Charlie Brown
Hi, I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed. It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-abi-18. So I try to install xserver from

Re: docbook-mathml (or w3-dtd-mathml) don't leave to install gnumexp: possible bug

2005-04-06 Thread Mark Johnson
://numexp.sourceforge.net/downloads.html page. I commented it to Gustavo (gustavo AT users.sourceforge.net) in a previous time, and he said me that it could be a possible bug but that the Debian bugzilla is too complex. So I mail you for that. I think that it's useful that anyone fix this b

Re: possible bug in gettext (autotools?) or in some packages

2001-05-03 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Thu, 3 May 2001 13:04:07 -0300 Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > Yo KoV, Yo hmh =) > On Thu, 03 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > I noticed while creating a package for a gettext enabled program, that > > make install was installing the .mo file as @INSTOBJEXT@ > >

Re: possible bug in gettext (autotools?) or in some packages

2001-05-03 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Thu, 3 May 2001 17:20:07 +0100 Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:32:28PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Do you have gettext installed on the machine you're trying to build on? > > I got exactly these symptoms until I installed gettext. [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: possible bug in gettext (autotools?) or in some packages

2001-05-03 Thread Paul Martin
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:32:28PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > so I checked /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES and noticed that > rpm and gtk+licq had also this problem. The problem is also happening > to other languages too as /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/ has a > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: possible bug in gettext (autotools?) or in some packages

2001-05-03 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
Yo KoV, On Thu, 03 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > I noticed while creating a package for a gettext enabled program, that > make install was installing the .mo file as @INSTOBJEXT@ Well, file important bugs against those packages, telling them to fix their packages to refresh and use the

possible bug in gettext (autotools?) or in some packages

2001-05-03 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hello Debian friends, I noticed while creating a package for a gettext enabled program, that make install was installing the .mo file as @INSTOBJEXT@ so I checked /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES and noticed that rpm and gtk+licq had also this problem. The problem is also happening to other lan

Re: Web page updated + possible bug in perl_5.005-02.1/sgmlspm_1.03ii-8

1998-10-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:36:21PM +0200, Ardo van Rangelrooij écrivait: > Hi, > > This probably means that the @INC built-in array of Perl is not > containing the directory /usr/lib/perl5/5.005. No, it's the contrary. He uses perl5.005 which do not look into /usr/lib/perl5 but in /usr/lib/perl5/

Re: Web page updated + possible bug in perl_5.005-02.1/sgmlspm_1.03ii-8

1998-10-08 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since /usr/lib/perl5/5.005 is not listed we're probably having a > problem at hand. Maybe a Perl bug? I meant here of course /usr/lib/perl5/5.004. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] home pa

Re: Web page updated + possible bug in perl_5.005-02.1/sgmlspm_1.03ii-8

1998-10-08 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Hi, This probably means that the @INC built-in array of Perl is not containing the directory /usr/lib/perl5/5.005. If you run perl -e 'print "@INC \n";' you should see the list of directories Perl searches for modules and such. On my i386 machine this lists the directories /usr/lib/perl5

Re: Web page updated + possible bug in perl_5.005-02.1/sgmlspm_1.03ii-8

1998-10-07 Thread Marc A. Volovic
BUG DESCRIPTION _AFTER_ nano-HOWTO info. On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 04:03:31PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote: > > FYI, the official Debian-Alpha port page has been updated > (http://www.debian.org/ports/alpha). It *should* have everything that we nano-HOWTO updated to include everything on Al

Possible bug in Apache 1.3.0...

1998-06-26 Thread Vincent Renardias
[Also sent to debian-devel, since I'm interested to hear about other people having noticed this problem] I run a medium sized webserver (~80.000 hits/day) with apache/1.3.0, however it occasionnaly stops answering http queries and forks > 120 http daemons, while I've set the max. forking limit to

possible bug in xemacs20/w3-el

1998-06-25 Thread Shaya Potter
I was trying to install the updated w3-el package, but it wouldn't work with xemacs on my machine, it seemed not to do any of the compiliation that was done for emacs20. It also killed the w3-el that came with xemacs. Is w3-el meant to be installed with xemacs? Shaya -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Possible bug in dpkg-source? Possible fix?

1997-05-30 Thread Jim Pick
> I'm using dpkg-dev 1.4.0.17. The problem is that not just with > source packages I create. It is with all source packages I'm > downloading, e.g., hello. > > The type of error I'm getting is as follows: > > dpkg-source: failure: remove patch backup file > hello-1.3/debian/substvars.

Re: Possible bug in dpkg-source? Possible fix?

1997-05-30 Thread Ben Pfaff
Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, I have looked through the man page for patch and it seems that > the option "-b" should be replaced with "-z". When I make the > substitution, all works well. > > Am I behind the times, or is this a bug? This *is* a bug. The `patch' command recentl

Possible bug in dpkg-source? Possible fix?

1997-05-30 Thread Paul Serice
I'm using dpkg-dev 1.4.0.17. The problem is that not just with source packages I create. It is with all source packages I'm downloading, e.g., hello. The type of error I'm getting is as follows: dpkg-source: failure: remove patch backup file hello-1.3/debian/substvars.dpkg-orig: No s

Re: Checking on possible bug in mt...

1996-09-03 Thread Brian Mays
> Rob Browning writes: Rob> I'm trying to decide if this is a bug in mt, or my relative Rob> inexperience with tape drives. If it's a bug I'll report it, Rob> and it'll probably have to go to the upstream maintainers. Rob> # mt --file /dev/nst0 tell Rob> mt: /dev/nst0: Fu