Re: [repost] Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22, also virtual packages

2005-05-21 Thread Eric Dorland
* Jorgen Schaefer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Note: > This is a repost of the mail at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg01000.html - no > replies were received at that time. I have now created a bug > report against debian-policy (#310113) requesting the creation > of t

[repost] Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22, also virtual packages

2005-05-21 Thread Jorgen Schaefer
Note: This is a repost of the mail at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg01000.html - no replies were received at that time. I have now created a bug report against debian-policy (#310113) requesting the creation of the virtual packages mentioned in the policy. I will wait

Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22

2005-04-25 Thread Jorgen Schaefer
Hello! The Scheme programming language is notorious for its lack of standardization. The SRFI process[1] is trying to mitigate this problem. Particularily, SRFI 22[2], "Running Scheme Scripts on Unix", tries to standardize interpreter names for Scheme scripts. This is relevant to Debian as this int