Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then, I don't understand why we have this discussion _after_ the policy
> has been changed...
> I thought the policy was a trustable document, where developers could
> find guidelines for their work, it seems that it's not always true. Sad.
debian-pol
On 5/3/06, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using the path component "cgi-lib" which will even be visible to users
of the web server looks like a big chunk of NIH to me. Even worse, it
will break existing URLs when CGIs start to move to their location.
To be honest, I thought this poli
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> In the meantime, do you suggest to use lintian overrides for fixing this
> in webapp packages or purely ignoring the lintian complaints?
Given that there is no support for this from webserver maintainers and no
proposed migration pa
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> >As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> >web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> >anymore:
>
> Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
> the other web serve
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
the other web servers in Debian (sans apache 1) combine
Re: Joey Hess 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I won't discuss here the goodwill of this change, I just want to
> > point out that by now, 110 packages are RC bug candidates because of
> > this [2] (422 files installed inder `/usr/lib/cgi-bin').
>
> Policy uses a "should" for this, so at most th
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
>
> Quoting lintian:
>
> This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
> which is reserved for the
hey alexis,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
> CGIs must be put under /usr/lib/cgi-lib now.
i'd hold off on that
Hello,
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Quoting lintian:
This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
which is reserved for the local use of webmasters.
CGI
9 matches
Mail list logo
