Mike Hommey skrev:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Bradley Smith skrev:
1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
static libraries as upstream intended?
There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really
have a strong o
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Bradley Smith skrev:
>> 1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
>> static libraries as upstream intended?
>
> There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really
> have a strong opinion my
Bradley Smith skrev:
1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
static libraries as upstream intended?
There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really
have a strong opinion myself (as long as the result works). But if I had
to choose, I'd probab
Hi,
I'm currently in the process of adopting plib and would like some
advice regrading it's shared/static libraries.
Upstream, plib is built as a set of static libraries due to the nature
of it's use, i.e. a set of helper libraries that programs will only use
part of. The Debian package currently
4 matches
Mail list logo
