Le mer. 11 oct. 2023 à 14:54, Jonathan Kamens a écrit :
> Can you confirm that this occurred with 4.0 rather than 4.1?
I'm a bit messy & forgetful these times.
But you have #1053812 against 4.1 already.
> > Can annotations/mypy testing be considered now "best practices" for
> > Debian native pack
On 10/11/23 03:37, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le dim. 8 oct. 2023 à 17:27, Jonathan Kamens a écrit :
I'd appreciate some testing from folks here before it gets promoted to unstable.
I got important NEWS from libx11 from 2006 (?)
so far so good for the rest.
Can you confirm that this occurre
Le dim. 8 oct. 2023 à 17:27, Jonathan Kamens a écrit :
> I'd appreciate some testing from folks here before it gets promoted to
> unstable.
I got important NEWS from libx11 from 2006 (?)
so far so good for the rest.
> the database needs to be populated with data for existing packages durin
N.B. apt-listchanges has been upgraded to 4.1 in experimental with some
significant fixes, so if you're testing 4.0, please upgrade to 4.1, and
if you're not testing yet, what are you waiting for? ;-)
Thanks to everyone who has tested and helped identify the issues fixed
in 4.1!
Thanks,
jik
Hello friends,
I've adopted apt-listchanges and pushed a new version, 4.0, to
experimental, with a bunch of fixes in it. Given how extensive the
changes are, I'd appreciate some testing from folks here before it gets
promoted to unstable. This package is widely used so it's kind of
important
5 matches
Mail list logo
