Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Which bad things happened that we have to change the current process?
As far as I see, it's more about "what good things didn't happen" why we
have to change the process.
That is also addresses a few corner cases that could've gone bad, but
never did is a side-effect.
-
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:57:49PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> The ftp team wants to change how allowing Debian Maintainers to upload
> packages works. The current approach with the DM-Upload-Allowed field
> has a few issues we would like to address:
I have read three responses to th
On 06/12/2012 12:24 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> - It allows DMs to grant permissions to other DMs.
>>
>> It is far from clear that forbidding this is the right thing to do.
>
> As far as I know, we did this intentionally. When a DM is the maintainer
> of a package, they should b
Ian Jackson wrote:
> > - It allows DMs to grant permissions to other DMs.
>
> It is far from clear that forbidding this is the right thing to do.
As far as I know, we did this intentionally. When a DM is the maintainer
of a package, they should be able to move it to team maintenance without
need
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Planned changes to Debian Maintainer uploads"):
> (Please send followup messages to -project.)
>
> The ftp team wants to change how allowing Debian Maintainers to upload
> packages works. The current approach with the DM-Upload-Allowed field
>
Hi,
(Please send followup messages to -project.)
The ftp team wants to change how allowing Debian Maintainers to upload
packages works. The current approach with the DM-Upload-Allowed field
has a few issues we would like to address:
- It applies to all DMs listed as Maintainer/Uploaders. It is
6 matches
Mail list logo
