Hallo Eric,
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>slrn
Fixed in experimental. I will soon provide a new version for unstable.
Bye, Jörg.
--
[dpkg] We are the apt. Resistance is futile. You will be packaged.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Adeodato Sim? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Eric Dorland [Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:28:18 -0500]:
>
> > 2. Upgrade to the latest version of automake, automake1.10, to stave
> > off obsolescence.
>
> For those not finding automake1.10, it's in the "automake" binary
> package.
automake currently prov
* Eric Dorland [Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:28:18 -0500]:
> 2. Upgrade to the latest version of automake, automake1.10, to stave
> off obsolescence.
For those not finding automake1.10, it's in the "automake" binary
package.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:28:18AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lineakd
Fixed version uploaded.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
As has become custom, it's time for removal of another old automake
version. This time I've picked automake1.8. Why not automake1.7?
Mostly because only 27 packages build depend on automake1.8 versus 72
on automake1.7.
Attached is a list of packages that build depend on
automake1.8. Please fix the
5 matches
Mail list logo
